| Discipline mix | Shows specialization, margins, and strategic buyer fit. | Revenue by civil, structural, MEP, environmental, geotechnical, infrastructure, and other disciplines. |
| Licensed professionals | Licenses support continuity, client trust, and project delivery. | PE roster, registrations, tenure, discipline, ownership status, and transition plan. |
| Utilization and billing | Drives profitability and buyer confidence in earnings quality. | Billable hours by person and discipline, standard rates, realization, write-downs and margin by project. |
| Backlog and pipeline | Shows future workload and revenue visibility. | Signed fees not yet earned, open proposals with win odds, expected awards and their timing. |
| Client concentration | Dependence on a few clients can affect buyer appetite and deal structure. | Largest clients by fee volume, master service agreements, repeat work history and the principal who owns each relationship. |
| Claims history | Professional liability exposure affects diligence and buyer risk. | Insurance records, claims, disputes, contracts, QA/QC process, and open issues. |
| Principal dependence | Owner-led relationships, stamping, or technical review can affect transition risk. | Principal role map, client handoff plan, reviewer depth, and succession plan. |
| Staff retention | Buyers need confidence that technical staff will remain after closing. | Staff roster, tenure, compensation, licenses, retention risk, and incentive plans. |
| Financial reporting | Project accounting has to agree with the financial statements, or buyers will discount the earnings they cannot trace. | Three years of statements and returns, add-back support, unbilled and WIP balances, receivables by client and subconsultant payables. |
| Project delivery systems | A documented QA/QC and project management process tells buyers that quality does not depend on one principal. | PM process, QA/QC workflow, software stack, templates, and project controls. |